Kelly Stafford and Matthew Stafford started their journey together as University of Georgia students. Kelly Stafford recently revealed some tempting secrets about their initial days of dating, one of which involves a cunning strategy to win over Matthew.
On a recent episode of her podcast, “The Morning After,” Kelly Stafford, wife of Los Angeles Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford, made a lighthearted revelation about their college relationship.
“Kelly Stafford, wife of NFL Los Angeles Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford, revealed in a podcast that she dated his backup quarterback at the University of Georgia to make him jealous”
According to a tweet by NFL Rumors (@nflrums), Mrs. Stafford disclosed that she once dated Matthew’s backup quarterback at the University of Georgia with the intention of piquing his romantic interest.
Kelly Stafford, wife of NFL Los Angeles Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford, revealed in a podcast that she dated his backup quarterback at the University of Georgia to make him jealous pic.twitter.com/OduglshYkD
— NFL Rumors (@nflrums) June 20, 2024
This disclosure has garnered attention on social media, prompting questions and amusement.
Kelly Stafford’s Tactical Romance Game
Kelly Stafford didn’t have an easy time getting Matthew, the star Bulldogs quarterback, to notice her. She had to employ a cunning strategy: dating his backup quarterback. Yes, you read that right! Kelly decided to make Matthew jealous by seeing someone else on the team. While she didn’t reveal the backup’s name, speculation points to Joe Cox or Logan Gray, both of whom were behind Matthew on the depth chart during their Georgia days.
The Mystery Backup
The mystery backup’s identity remains undisclosed, but Kelly’s plan worked like a charm. Matthew eventually took notice, and their love story began. Fast forward to today, and the Staffords have been happily married for over two decades. Matthew has achieved NFL stardom, winning a Super Bowl and earning multiple Pro Bowl selections.
ALSO READ: Aaron Rodgers’ Concerns: Government Surveillance and “1984”
